RAI SOLUTIONS / DIAGNOSTICS

Digital pathology, connected to care.

Give pathology teams a coherent view of the slide, the case and the clinical context. RAI brings whole slide imaging and carefully evaluated AI into a workflow led by the pathologist.

Explore capabilities ↗
Pathologist reviewing a digitized tissue slide on a clinical workstation

THE DIGITAL WORKBENCH

From specimen to signed report.

Support the people and systems involved in diagnosis with clear case context and traceable review.

01 / ACQUISITION

Whole slide imaging

Connect scanners and image storage to ingest, index and display digitized slides with case identifiers, stain, magnification and provenance. Make scan quality checks and rescans visible before diagnostic review.

Scanner connectivity · Slide metadata · Image quality review · Secure storage

02 / REVIEW

Pathology viewer and worklists

Navigate large slides, compare stains and prior specimens, annotate regions and organize work by case. Keep relevant request details and clinical history within reach during review.

Case worklists · Multi-slide comparison · Annotations · Prior cases

03 / COLLABORATION

Consultation and teaching

Share selected cases with authorized colleagues for second opinion, multidisciplinary review or education. Record who reviewed what, their comments and the resulting case decision.

Second opinions · Tumor boards · Controlled sharing · Audit history

04 / ASSISTANCE

Pathologist-supervised AI

Present validated AI findings as reviewable overlays, region suggestions or measurements with model version, confidence and source slide. The pathologist can accept, correct or reject each result; AI does not issue an autonomous diagnosis.

Region prioritization · Quantification · Reviewable overlays · Human sign-out

05 / INTEGRATION

Connected pathology records

Link slide images, specimens and approved findings to the laboratory information system and clinical record. Use appropriate interoperability standards and local mapping, with role-based access and a complete audit trail.

LIS / LIMS · EHR / HIS · DICOM WSI where supported · FHIR / HL7 interfaces

06 / OPERATIONS

Quality and governance

Monitor scan quality, turnaround and AI performance in the actual laboratory population. Establish local validation, change control and escalation before any clinical deployment.

Local validation · Drift monitoring · Quality assurance · Traceability

RESPONSIBLE IMPLEMENTATION

Evidence before clinical use.

Diagnostic use depends on the scanner, viewer, image quality, intended purpose and local workflow. Evaluate each combination for its intended use and regulatory setting before adoption. Keep the original image and human review available at every consequential step.

01

Define the use case

Specify specimen types, stains, users and the decision the system supports.

02

Validate locally

Measure performance across scanners, sites and relevant patient groups.

03

Monitor in service

Track errors, corrections, model changes and outcomes over time.

FURTHER READING

How should pathology AI be validated?

Read our guide to evaluating AI in digital pathology ↗